Saturday, November 21, 2009

Getting money in bad: thoughts on the blue line

Blogger "microstakes bankroll builder" had a post this week that got me thinking about the blue line which measures EV. He wrote, in part:
Anyone that whines about being unlucky has "loser" written all over them in my mind, and who probably persuades themselves eventually into seeing monsters under the bed, gorging on their bad-beat-jackpot stories and continuing their boring downward spiralling vicious circle and compounding their bad luck.

Lets just think about it for a second…….

Conversely, of course you can only run above EV when you consistently get your money in bad....makes sense no? getting your money in bad is baaaaad. Getting your money in good (ie at least 51%, but usually at least 68% upwards) means you can only be sucked out on. You can’t give the bad beat.
 (My bold). This seems contradictory: if we do worry constantly about "monsters under the bed" we'll never get our money in bad, and we'll never get it in good without the absolute nuts either.

In particular, the blue line doesn't take into account fold equity, our perceived range, and pots odds, all of which can be dubious theoretical puzzle pieces in the micros, but still important for playing the game correctly, regardless of whether we're actually getting our money in bad or not.

Two of my hands this week show these phenomenon in action.



PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.50 BB (8 handed) - Poker-Stars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

CO ($95.90)
Button ($61.95)
SB ($30)
Hero (BB) ($50)
UTG ($52.90)
UTG+1 ($51.25)
MP1 ($50.50)
MP2 ($60.85)

Preflop: Hero is BB with 6, A
2 folds, MP1 bets $1, 1 fold, CO calls $1, 2 folds, Hero calls $0.50

Sort of off to an odd beginning. Middle Position #1 just min raised my blind, and the Cut Off only calls. With a suited Ace and 50 cents already in the pot, I have to complete.

Flop: ($3.25) J, A, A (3 players)
Hero checks, MP1 bets $2, CO calls $2, Hero calls $2

I flop trip aces, and decide to slow play.

Turn: ($9.25) 6 (3 players)

Yahtzee! I turn the second nuts, behind only an unlikely AJ (which would be the case Ace and second Jack in play). No point in slow playing, but I don't want to push out heart draws so I make a here-kitty-kitty bet of 1/3 the pot

Hero bets $3, MP1 raises to $7

This raise by MP1 is absolutely great news, and I immediately put him on JJ.

CO calls $7

This I don't like so much. Now I'm thinking CO has the case Ace, certainly with a better kicker than I have, but not a J -- again, I'm sure I know where three of those are.

Hero raises to $15

So now I have to build the pot against MP1's smaller FH and charge the Cut Off for his unlikely draw.

, MP1 calls $8, CO calls $8

Well, I couldn't push the CO out. He is a 33/9, and they do tend to be calling stations, so this isn't too unexpected. He definitely has Ax for some given x, I decide.

River: ($54.25) K (3 players)

Well, that's about the worst card in the deck. If CO has AK, I'm hosed. MP1 might decide I have AK and so I go for thin value (which should also look a lot like a missed flush draw, inducing a shove).

Hero bets $10, MP1 raises to $32.50 (All-In)

Good, good.

, CO raises to $55

Oh, #@@#%. So now what do I do?



I'm getting 5.85:1 on a call, and exactly two hands beat me, both involving that case Ace.

, Hero calls $22 (All-In)

Total pot: $151.25 | Rake: $3
Main pot: $150.25 between CO, Hero and MP1, won by CO
Side pot 1: $1 between CO and MP1, won by CO

Results below:
Hero had 6, A (full house, Aces over sixes).
MP1 had J, J (full house, Jacks over Aces).
CO had A, K (full house, Aces over Kings).
Outcome: CO won $148.25


Now, my blue line is sunk since I got $32 in "baaaad" but I don't think I played it bad. I could have shoved the turn, but with the near certainty of stacking MP1 anyway and letting CO draw to a mere 3-outer I feel my small 4-bet was absolutely the correct play.

So here's the second hand where I got my money in "baaaad" against a passive 37/4 calling station

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.50 BB (9 handed) - Poker-Stars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com


Hero (BB) ($59.40)
UTG ($110.25)
UTG+1 ($30.60)
MP1 ($50)
MP2 ($106.65)
MP3 ($40.35)
CO ($54)
Button ($56.80)
SB ($50.40)


Preflop: Hero is BB with K, A
UTG calls $0.50, UTG+1 calls $0.50, 2 folds, MP3 bets $2.50, 2 folds, SB calls $2.25, Hero raises to $12.50,




Pretty standard squeeze from the Big Blind with AK given the table dynamics.

2 folds, MP3 calls $10, 1 fold

One caller, the 37/4 loose passive in Middle Position #3.

Flop: ($28.50) Q, 10, 4 (2 players)

Pretty good flop for me against a loose passive player. If he has a middle pair I've got 10 outs twice, any Ace, King, or a Jack for the straight. And I have to continue bet, since my perceived range should include AA, KK and QQ, all of which are monsters to this board which I'd play the exact same way.

Hero bets $18, MP3 raises to $27.85 (All-In)

Well, that sucks. But now I've still got 60/40 drawing odds unless somehow he has QQ, TT, 44 or (blockers) JJ, and it only costs me ~$10 to call. (Since I have an A and a K and MP3 plays so many hands, I figure AA and KK to be unlikely.)

, Hero calls $9.85

It turns out villain had 88; I played the hand absolutely correctly, imo (not per Sklansky, but you know what I mean), even though I got every penny in "baaaad" and my blue EV line will tell me I'm just a luckbox when the turn and river come a K for top pair and an unneeded J for the straight.

Turn: ($84.20) K (2 players, 1 all-in)

River: ($84.20) J (2 players, 1 all-in)

Total pot: $84.20 | Rake: $3

Main pot: $84.20 between Hero and MP3, won by Hero




Smashing Pumpkins - Blew Away

4 comments:

  1. Conan

    Thanks for the reference, and interesting post.

    Not sure I agree with your analysis through those 2 hands, and in fact I think these hands typify precisely why you should forget about the AI EV line, as it can help you play sub-optimally, and sometimes tilt you as you stare at it as you think what you “should have had” during a session

    Hand 1 is a totally standard cooler, and as Mudwig correctly noted, the AI line takes no account of coolers. The chance at micro stakes that your opponents had weaker hands than you, in % terms, correctly means you had the odds to call. I rarely slow-play on that turn multiway, as you are definitely getting all sorts of calls from worse and you want to build the pot, but your play is fine. There is simply no way to get away from that.

    Moaning about coolers (the bad-beat-jackpot-lovers) is for losers.

    Hand 2 is a bit more iffy. Lets ignore the fact you cbet into a short stack calling station who is unlikely to fold (as I think you should be just checking v a passive donk shorty 100% of the time here oop, he’s gonna give you the free card so often, so you make a mistake here). So I don’t agree you played it 100% correctly as you say.
    Squeezing is fine here, and once you have bet into the pot at that point you are repping AQ, AA, KK and possibly JJ, all entirely plausible from your preflop action. All of which crush 88. Any person with half a brain will give up here, and here is where I don’t agree with your comments relating to my own post. I made the point that the AI EV line takes no account of fold equity, which is an essential part of no-limit. You had a ton of fold equity in that spot, and yet the AI EV graph just shows you way behind (37% in my calcs) saying you got your money in “baaaad”, but forgetting about you cbet, you got your money in good in the end. It happened that you were up against a superdonk who was simply incable of folding.

    My point in the post was to forget about AI EV, stop whining about the calling stations and bad beats (which the EV graph promotes), and get on with the business of winning. And if you do in fact, worry about monsters in the bed, and just get your money in with the nuts, I would love to see you at HU or 6max any day of the week.
    ReplyDelete
  2. Yeah, we basically agree; I just wanted to make the point that running above EV isn't necessarily a sign of "playing bad and just luck-boxing" explicit.
    ReplyDelete
  3. omg this whole debate is fucking retarded.
    ReplyDelete